Manila, Philippines – August 2025
The House of Representatives has filed a motion for reconsideration to the Supreme Court regarding its decision that ruled the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte to be barred by the one-year rule.
House’s Position on the Issue
Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez, a lawyer by profession, explained that this motion for reconsideration was not an act of defiance but an exercise of the House’s constitutional duty.
He emphasized that the House holds the exclusive power to initiate impeachment cases, a power clearly defined in the 1987 Constitution.
Romualdez stressed that the House of Representatives is the voice of the people in matters of accountability and it is essential that this power remains unchallenged.
He argued that the Supreme Court’s decision in G.R. No. 278353 misinterpreted facts and imposed new rules retroactively, thus violating the constitutional mandate.
The Supreme Court’s Ruling
The Supreme Court had previously ruled that the impeachment complaint against VP Duterte was invalid due to the one-year rule in the Constitution, which prohibits filing multiple impeachment complaints against the same official within one year. This decision effectively halted the impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte.
Legal Basis for the Motion
In the motion for reconsideration, Speaker Romualdez cited the 1987 Constitution, which gives the House of Representatives the exclusive authority to initiate impeachment proceedings, without any need for prior approval or conditions.
He pointed out that the Court’s ruling conflicts with this provision and undermines the House’s role in holding officials accountable.
Impact of the Motion for Reconsideration
The motion for reconsideration is an effort by the House of Representatives to restore its constitutional powers and to ensure the accountability of government officials. If the Supreme Court agrees to revisit its ruling, it could have significant implications for future impeachment cases.
Next Steps in the Process
The Supreme Court will now review the motion for reconsideration filed by the House of Representatives and decide whether or not to revisit the ruling that declared the impeachment complaint against VP Duterte invalid. The decision could either reverse the ruling or clarify legal principles regarding impeachment proceedings in the future.
Conclusion
The motion for reconsideration represents a key moment in the ongoing political and legal challenges surrounding Vice President Sara Duterte.
As the House of Representatives asserts its constitutional authority, the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision will shape the future of impeachment cases in the country.
References:
- Gatchalian expects DBM to come up with `president’s budget’ next week.
- House seeks reversal of Supreme Court decision blocking Sara impeachment trial.
- House asks Senate: Don’t rush decision on Sara Duterte trial.
Maria Theresa Mondragon, better known online as Antie Marites, is a 33-year-old Filipina content creator who’s turning “chismis” into credible news and meaningful conversation.
With a knack for storytelling and a passion for public service updates, Antie Marites creates relatable, informative, and bite-sized news content for the digital Pinoy. Whether it’s trending headlines, government announcements, or everyday life in the Philippines, she breaks it down in a way that’s clear, fun, and easy to understand—no filter, no fake news.
She’s the tita who sips her kape while scrolling DBM updates and turns it into your next viral TikTok.She’s also your go-to source for “real talk sa real-time news.”
Follow her journey and daily chika on:
📲 Facebook: OMGMarites
📱 TikTok: @omgmarites2025